- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 09:54:17 +1000
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
> On 30 Jun 2015, at 1:20 am, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > > Obviously, this is an imperfect model but given that Activities have, > for the most part, been used primarily to record Activities that have > already occurred, the rules haven't proven to be much of a problem. Ok, that makes sense…so perhaps just add to the Activity note section that the ‘state’ should be expressed using the date properties. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Monday, 29 June 2015 23:54:50 UTC