Re: standardizing webmention

So... if a webmention endpoint accepted

{"source":"http://example.com/post","target":"http://elpmaxe.org/post"}

instead of source=http://example.com/post&target=http://elpmaxe.org/post

is that what you'd want to see?

I don't think I understand your PHP reference.

On 15 July 2015 at 11:30, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 15 July 2015 at 12:20, Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Webmention itself doesn't care about the data structure of the source. If
>> you can retrieve JSON from the source URL (whether by parsing microformats,
>> content negotiation, or following a link rel or whatever) then this works
>> just fine according to the charter.
>>
>
> I get what you are saying.  Replace "webmention" in the sentence above
> with "PHP".  It would be an equally true sentence.
>
> In general the point, was not about what webmention can reference or
> process.  It was about what it accepts.  What I think would be nice is if
> all the technologies we have on the REC track could support the common JSON
> social syntax.
>
>
>>
>> On 15 July 2015 at 09:42, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 July 2015 at 08:19, Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > For example sending a direct message via a JSON activity stream, is
>>>> one of the user stories.
>>>>
>>>> Which user story mentions json or activity streams?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The charter does.
>>>
>>>
>>
>