Re: Webfinger

On 01/31/2015 04:33 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I think it's sufficient to define one or more link relations for Social
> API endpoints.
>     outbox
>     inbox
>     following
>     groups
>     lists
> That way different discovery mechanisms for different kinds of URI
> identifiers (http, Webfinger, etc.) will work fine.

I would prefer not to put limitations of JRD upon our work, and use
webfinger *only* as a way to get equivalent http: / https: URI for URIs
using other schemes acct: , mailto: , xmpp: etc.

Then stating the actual relations (links/predicates) in JSON-LD document
representing particular resource.

Received on Saturday, 31 January 2015 15:51:01 UTC