- From: Crawford, Mark <mark.crawford@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 16:59:27 +0000
- To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>, Francesco Ariis <fa-ml@ariis.it>
- CC: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Perhaps the subject should be changed so as not to confuse as Social Justice is a politically charged term that should probably be avoided: Social Justice - "justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities, and privileges within a society". Classically, "justice" (especially corrective justice or distributive justice) referred to ensuring that individuals both fulfilled their societal roles, and received what was due from society. Best Regards, Mark -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Allan Webber [mailto:cwebber@dustycloud.org] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:38 AM To: Francesco Ariis Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org Subject: Re: Distributed architecture and social justice / at risk individuals Francesco Ariis writes: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:11:05PM -0600, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >> I'm not proposing any thoughts of my own in this email... I think it's >> best to let hers take center stage. But I'm interested in peoples' >> feedback on how we can make federated technologies more responsive to >> these needs/concerns? > > Not federated, but p2p projects like twister [1] and the more > comprehensive [2] gnunet plus some client side scripting should > address most if not all the problems. > > [1] http://twister.net.co/ > [2] https://gnunet.org/ How so?
Received on Monday, 12 January 2015 16:59:58 UTC