Re: Applied invited experts

The chairs started to discuss today, but paused it as part of a larger 
IE process issue that will hopefully be resolved in a week or two, as 
mentioned in today's telecon.

         -- Sandro

On 12/14/2015 05:14 PM, elf Pavlik wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 09:03 PM, Ben wrote:
>> I followed http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg#How_to_participate and had
>> little trouble with the process.  It is one of the first things on the
>> front page of the WG wiki.
> I had online chat earlier today with Frank Karlitschek of ownCloud and
> pointed him to that link. He should have officially applied now!
>
>> Ben.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Christopher Allan Webber
>> <cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote:
>>> Sandro Hawke writes:
>>>
>>>> On 12/12/2015 10:46 AM, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>>>>> Jason Robinson writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have four people in the "Applied for Membership" section in the wiki
>>>>>> (https://www.w3.org/Social/WG#Applied_for_Membership).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    From my part, I would really encourage inviting especially Michael
>>>>>> Vogel of Friendica and Frank Karlitschek of ownCloud. Is there a process
>>>>>> that the WG follows regarding timetable to process applicants?
>>>>> Seconded.
>>>> I just looked at the four entries.  One (Rene) was accepted some time
>>>> ago; I removed that entry.  One (Tibor) is confusing; it's more than a
>>>> year old, and I can't find a record of what happened with it.
>>>> Hopefully one of the chairs can.   The other two (Frank and Michael) do
>>>> not appear to have filed applications.  I've added a note to this effect
>>>> and asked that submission dates be put there so it's easier to
>>>> cross-check in the future.    (The application software is ancient and
>>>> annoying, but I haven't seen it drop anything yet.)
>>>>
>>>>         -- Sandro
>>> Figuring out how to apply is confusing from that page.  I don't even
>>> remember what I did.  I guess it's the process at the top of this:
>>>
>>>    http://www.w3.org/2004/08/invexp.html
>>>
>>> ... but that isn't on the wiki, in either of the places invited experts
>>> are listed.  I suspect people are adding themselves to the wiki and
>>> assuming that's all they have to do.
>>>
>>> Is there any intentional reason there aren't specific instructions on
>>> that page?  Should I update with that link?  Or is there another link I
>>> should put on there?
>>>
>>>   - Chris
>>>

Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2015 18:46:10 UTC