- From: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:03:50 -0500
- To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Jason Robinson <mail@jasonrobinson.me>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
I followed http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg#How_to_participate and had little trouble with the process. It is one of the first things on the front page of the WG wiki. Ben. On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Sandro Hawke writes: > >> On 12/12/2015 10:46 AM, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >>> Jason Robinson writes: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> We have four people in the "Applied for Membership" section in the wiki >>>> (https://www.w3.org/Social/WG#Applied_for_Membership). >>>> >>>> From my part, I would really encourage inviting especially Michael >>>> Vogel of Friendica and Frank Karlitschek of ownCloud. Is there a process >>>> that the WG follows regarding timetable to process applicants? >>> Seconded. >> >> I just looked at the four entries. One (Rene) was accepted some time >> ago; I removed that entry. One (Tibor) is confusing; it's more than a >> year old, and I can't find a record of what happened with it. >> Hopefully one of the chairs can. The other two (Frank and Michael) do >> not appear to have filed applications. I've added a note to this effect >> and asked that submission dates be put there so it's easier to >> cross-check in the future. (The application software is ancient and >> annoying, but I haven't seen it drop anything yet.) >> >> -- Sandro > > Figuring out how to apply is confusing from that page. I don't even > remember what I did. I guess it's the process at the top of this: > > http://www.w3.org/2004/08/invexp.html > > ... but that isn't on the wiki, in either of the places invited experts > are listed. I suspect people are adding themselves to the wiki and > assuming that's all they have to do. > > Is there any intentional reason there aren't specific instructions on > that page? Should I update with that link? Or is there another link I > should put on there? > > - Chris >
Received on Monday, 14 December 2015 20:04:19 UTC