- From: Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 08:35:53 -0500
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAArs9HjfqxtJCt6oJ1a0e=vAPtGvaMdooGjxMWiCxjCDfyHN+w@mail.gmail.com>
That's the "Participating" section of the notification settings. And it's much better than an email list where you get no such controls. On Dec 3, 2015 8:33 AM, "James M Snell" <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > The downside is that if someone is explicitly @ mentioned in the thread, > even if they have unsubscribed or are not watching, they will be > resubscribed to that thread automatically, so please keep that in mind. > On Dec 3, 2015 3:51 AM, "Ben" <ben@thatmustbe.me> wrote: > >> Woops, sorry, didn't mean to send that, was just gathering links. >> >> Those links let you turn off "Automatic Watching" which is the >> "opt-in" you have set for all github. I don't think this can be set >> per org. >> >> Also, you can unfollow whole repositories, no need to use a spam filter. >> >> What part are you objecting to? >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ben <ben@thatmustbe.me> wrote: >> > https://github.com/settings/notifications >> > https://github.com/watching >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Melvin Carvalho >> > <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've had about 100 or so unsolicited emails from a github repository >> >> associated with this group. >> >> >> >> I've tried unsubsribing, unwatching and leaving all associated groups >> but I >> >> still get emails. >> >> >> >> Im a big github user, probably the most active in this group. But, I >> have >> >> found this workflow to be super unproductive, both participating >> actively >> >> and passively. >> >> >> >> My final attempt is to put a spam filter on as many of the mails as I >> can. >> >> >> >> I have also reviewed: >> >> >> >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/github >> >> >> >> If people want to work in this way, and find it productive, that's >> great. >> >> But please let it be opt-in. >> >> >> >> Please could also the w3c part be removed from the name as, as far as I >> >> understand it, it's not part of the official w3c process, or >> affiliated with >> >> the w3c, and it may give the wrong impression. Consider this an >> official >> >> objection! >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >>
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2015 13:36:26 UTC