IG to help resolve objections on user stories

Greetings Social IG folks --

In the Social WG meeting today, I asked to discuss whether or not it is useful for the IG to work on clarification of Social API voting objections 

You can read the minutes here: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-08-25-minutes#Social_API_user_stories 

To me, the first part of the discussion was confusing. In reality I think Evan, Tantek and I were all agreeing, although we had different ways we were saying the words. If someone thinks we were each voicing different views, I'd really appreciate hearing about it.

I believe the conclusion is as follows (read the latter part of the minutes):  

A) It would be helpful for the IG to help resolve questions / concerns / issues with the user stories.
B) It would also be helpful for us to identify the user stories that seem like they would be easiest to bring into full consensus (e.g., the objections would be pretty easy to resolve).
C) We should ping the individual WG objectors, to pull them into conversations on their particular objections.
D) As we resolve issues on stories, we should report back to the WG with proposals of user stories -- perhaps slightly re-written -- to be accepted.
E) ... anything else?

I have a lot of handwritten notes on my printout of the User Story voting, with I intend to start sifting through.

Tomorrow (8/25) is an off-week for our meetings. Regardless, I will be online and dialed into WebEx, if anyone wants to chat. 

  -- Ann

Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 23:02:10 UTC