- From: Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:18:18 +0000
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAG_bHozRXf93S1SjturUuk5EAhZOxMu7-ZatVtBebBVjfXRtQA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the explanation James... I also highlighted an error in the example, not sure if you saw that or not? Thanks, --tim On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@us.ibm.com> wrote: > The basic rule is that unless the property is marked as "functional" in > the vocabulary document, it can have one or more values. As an artifact of > the JSON-LD serialization, if there is a single value, it will not be > wrapped in an Array. Also keep in mind that for object properties, the > value *could* be a string with a URI value. > > The following, then, are equivalent: > > { "@type": "Note", "attachment": "http://example.org/abc123" } > { "@type": "Note", "attachment": {"@id": "http://example.org/abc123"}} > { "@type": "Note": "attachment": [{"@id": "http://example.org/abc123"}]} > { "@type": "Note": "attachment": ["http://example.org/abc123"]} > > > > - James Snell > jasnell@us.ibm.com > Technology & Partnerships > IBM Open Technologies Architect - Node.js, Mobile Backend & Cloud > (559) 707-6331 (mobile) > > [image: Inactive hide details for Tim Williams ---08/14/2015 12:13:24 > PM---Sorry if this is a repeat but it doesn't look like my first]Tim > Williams ---08/14/2015 12:13:24 PM---Sorry if this is a repeat but it > doesn't look like my first one arrived... Hi all, > > From: Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com> > To: public-socialweb@w3.org > Date: 08/14/2015 12:13 PM > Subject: Fwd: objects and arrays > ------------------------------ > > > > Sorry if this is a repeat but it doesn't look like my first one arrived... > > Hi all, > Should a consumer of AS expect an array of object's for any property > of an Object type? I notice examples[0] where the type is Link|Object > but the example has an array. In some cases (e.g attributedTo) it > hints to multiple in the Notes but others (e.g. attachment) the Note > implies singular. Sorry for such an elementary question, I'm happy to > accept a link to where I've missed it in the docs:) > > I also notice an error in Example 700[1] where it starts as an array > "[" but ends as an object "}". > > Thanks, > --tim > > [0] - http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-attributedto > [1] - http://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-title > > > > >
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2015 13:18:46 UTC