- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:37:13 +0200
- To: "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
- Cc: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>, Social Interest Group <public-social-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+H-ohe=hoLsQ7-nkZx6YxGcr3HJ=tnYj1j11zUQ3ZCCw@mail.gmail.com>
On 12 August 2015 at 11:13, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11 August 2015 at 09:58, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com> wrote: > >> Hi Social Folks -- >> >> I just entered my regrets into the wiki, for tomorrow's WG meeting. I'm >> hoping this will be the last week I'm out. (Been working really hard on my >> 94-year-old Mom's house, and with home health care providers, seeking as >> many assistive options as we can think of, so she can continue to live >> independently.) >> >> One idea we had in the Social IG meeting a couple weeks ago, was to use >> the Social WG 'off' week meeting times, to meet with WG folks (whoever we >> can get to show up) -- to try and talk through the objections on various >> user stories. Many of the ones with 'minor' objections seem based in nuance >> of language, about how the story was written -- more than objection to the >> fundamental concept of the story. >> >> Although we've had some really interesting discussions within the IG, and >> with a couple WG 'objectors' attending, it seems clear we need more WG >> involvement in these discussions. >> >> If the WG A) still thinks it would be useful to work through the user >> story objections; and, B) thinks it would be OK to use the alternating >> 'off' weeks for such discussion -- I will set it up for next Tuesday. >> > > Hi Ann > > The question of approved user stories was raised in yesterday's meeting. > Evan said that he seemed to recall that all the +1 user stories and the > +1/0 user stories might be considered approved. We weren't 100% sure on > the call, I think a couple of people said they would check back on this. > Seems a reasonable approach. Also note a few of the user stories now have > existing implementations. > I also think it may be a good opportunity to revisit the analysis of voting. +1 was supposed to mean "will implement' . But only 2 / 90 are marked as implemented. And only 1 so far using activity streams. And none have been implemented by all groups. > >> >> >> I'm looking forward to getting back to this! >> >> -- AnnB >> >> Ann Bassetti >> The Boeing Company >> >> *From: *Arnaud Le Hors >> *Sent: *Monday, August 10, 2015 11:58 AM >> *To: *public-socialweb@w3.org >> *Subject: *Social Web WG agenda for 11 August 2015 >> >> Now available: >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-08-11 >> -- >> Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - >> IBM Software Group >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 11:37:43 UTC