- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:51:14 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 09/24/2014 05:40 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > The last meeting with had a quite vigorous discussion of JSON and JSON-LD. > > I'd like to see folks who want JSON-LD as a requirement justify their > position, and folks who would like to see it as an option but not > required justify their position. > > Let the fun begin :) I wonder who have read those two posts? First from Shane Becker (IndieWebCamp) against JSON-LD (2013-08-08) * http://iamshane.com/articles/2013/8/8/1/json-ld-is-an-unneeded-spec Second from Manu Sporny (one of JSON-LD spec authors&editors) in reply to Shane's post (2013-08-10) * http://manu.sporny.org/2013/json-ld-is-the-bees-knees/ In *my very personal opinion* Shane's post might have spread quite some FUD in IndieWebCamp circle, eg. http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2014-09-17/line/1410986478581 I even have already suggested Shane, at some point in a past, to link from his original post to Manu's reply (with no luck): https://twitter.com/elfpavlik/status/418678479614263297 I feel like taking this conversation here bit into 'soap opera' direction. I still think better that we can stay aware that that topic may have various emotional loads. BTW Today I also noticed that Manu Sporny have subscribed as observer for Social Web meeting during TPAC :) https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2014/registrants#SW o/
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2014 12:53:29 UTC