Re: Wednesday morning for Schema.org/Actions BOF? [was Re: The Vocabulary, Schema.org governance, etc.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 09/29/2014 05:16 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> I don't see anything about this meeting on the TPAC page for
> proposals for this session.  Is this part of the process just being
> skipped?
> 
> As well, will an agenda be prepared for this session?  There are a 
> number of things on the boundary between W3c and schema.org that I
> think should be discussed.  Some of these might be relevant to this
> session, but others might not.   An agenda might help preventing
> the session from going off into things that are not relevant to the
> purpose of the meeting.
> 

We're waiting for a "yes" response from someone from the schema.org
community, and then I'll add a page ASAP. Ian has already approved
internally for reserving us a session.

And yes, we'd want to corroborate on an agenda with everyone.

  yours,
      harry

> peter
> 
> 
> On 09/29/2014 07:30 AM, Harry Halpin wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 09/29/2014 04:15 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>>> On 09/24/2014 02:20 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
>>>> Everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> The W3C is happy to use one of the rooms during its "BOF" 
>>>> sessions on Wednesday morning for a meeting around
>>>> schema.org, Actions, and the Social WG.
>>>> 
>>>> The meeting would be open to *everyone* at TPAC, not just
>>>> Social WG members and those from schema.org.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope this works for everyone!
>>>> 
>>>> The schedule is here:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2014
>>>> 
>>>> A room will be reserved with this pre-set topic for 9:15 AM.
>>>> We can then continue as needed. Does this work for everyone?
>>> Can I participate remotely?
>> 
>> We'll do our best for remote participation. IRC is definitely
>> always running and we'll have a scribe, audio can be trickier
>> depending o the venue's set-up but I'll know a few days a head of
>> time when I get to the venue for TPAC.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you Harry for arranging this possibility to meet f2f and 
>>> clarify all the possibilities for further collaboration!
>>> 
>> 
>> Hope it works for the schema.org folks! Does it?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=NP+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 29 September 2014 15:18:37 UTC