Re: Meeting with Schema.org team during TPAC

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/23/2014 12:22 AM, Harry Halpin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/22/2014 08:07 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
>> Hi,
> 
>> I added to tomorrow's WG agenda proposal to discuss meeting with 
>> Schema.org team during TPAC * 
>> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2014-09-23#Meeting_with_Schema.org_team_.40TPAC
>
>>
>> 
I tried to recap on agenda page recent conversation about it
>> over public-vocabs list, which so far involved Peter Mika 
>> (Yahoo), Chaals Nevile (Yandex), Ramanathan V. Guha (Google), 
>> James M Snell, Dan Brickley (Google)
> 
>> TL;DR James raised issue with non Social WG members limited to 
>> observing and no voice during our sessions. Dan proposed BOF on 
>> Thursday morning.
> 
> Note that this is at chair's discretion. I believe having a 
> discussion during that Monday->Tuesday with schema.org folks and 
> Social WG should be no problem.
> 
> Thursday morning will conflict with other WG meetings for quite a 
> few members.
Could we please clarify it during our teleconf tomorrow?
I would like to get back ASAP to schema.org folks, interested in such
discussion, with a clear reply.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUIKJwAAoJEIsH3HQVV7MfSYQH/jhfYe6Zwbd3KaoN5Ogm73R3
9hw/abuI0l6pQQuU0WODSUDEilh7ELGbdAK4cLJi+usqKL1f5OFKgJO2XYkAucOz
HtIgLppy3ZeSIxIWAeyy65Mls0ZDLfhT+lBEjmkxWKndsVK1hq9dzV52YnOrsB0B
GxaXKtEgSDmm+w0QFE0xyA6dXtNMQ7D2eR7LnTKchoM3yKQYAzAE5obSyD4DwMJN
t5GAsbn3R5n4kZQPxev5cMZEYwmWibRmzCvoLZ2f1fXUV7SFugKRcffJwkxvkQDG
FgtSSWj2J/wRW7jtQ5MozQWAzvsvr3rxcpMxOJWKOVeWBvFfv94VS/X1IYBejeI=
=5tx6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Monday, 22 September 2014 22:30:17 UTC