Comparing Activity Streams / Schema.org / Hydra (former: 'Fwd: Schema.org applies W3C Patent Policy')

Hello,

I would like to propose in depth discussion on Schema.org / Activity
Streams / Hydra

We have both ActivityStreams & Schema.org listed at
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_syntax

I can also recall at least two articles by James Snell where he works
with them both:
*
http://www.chmod777self.com/2014/04/activity-streams-20-and-schemaorgactions.html
* http://www.chmod777self.com/2014/05/more-on-activity-streams-20-and.html

Then again Schema.org Actions and Hydra have many similarities and
history of collaboration:
http://blog.schema.org/2014/04/announcing-schemaorg-actions.html

I must admit not reading enough yet about Activity Streams 2.0 Action
Handlers to position them here...

#ACTION - Would someone like to work with me in next two weeks to
prepare overview of similarities and differences in all mentioned
technologies? It would hopefully make it much easier for everyone to
engage in further conversation.

Cheers!

On 09/01/2014 07:58 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
> In case people missed this from the last IG meeting!
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Schema.org applies W3C Patent Policy
> Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:54:15 +0000
> Resent-From: public-socialweb@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 19:54:07 +0200
> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> To: public-socialweb@w3.org <public-socialweb@w3.org>
> 
> Those who were at the Social Standards workshop last August will
> remember a discussion with Guha over schema.org and licensing. People
> should  know that Schema.org has now changed their licensing to be
> royalty-free in the following manner:
> 
> "The Sponsors have applied the W3C Patent Policy to the schemas
> published by Schema.org as follows: each Sponsor, by itself and on
> behalf of its affiliates, agrees to make available under W3C RF
> licensing requirements its Essential Claims (if any) in the schemas
> published by Schema.org as if the schemas were W3C Recommendations. In
> some cases, this website may indicate that some but not all of the
> Sponsors have recognized a particular extension to the Schema; in
> those cases, as to that extension, the above rights are granted by
> only those recognizing Sponsors. " [1]
> 
>    cheers,
>     harry
> 
> [1]https://www.schema.org/docs/terms.html
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 14:21:44 UTC