- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 14:23:42 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
I just created issue on github relevant to this: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/57 <blockquote> *clarify consequences of choice between as:Object and as:Link* Currently most terms have range set to "rdfs:range": ["as:Object", "as:Link"] I would see need for non-normative section eleborating on consequences of choosing to use one or the other. IMO many developers can find it confusing to face such choice and make such decision without realizing possible consequences. Also it may make sense to recommend implementations to expect and handle properly both. </blockquote> One can also find in that issue an example from Link section of the spec written using both patterns, we could possibly use it for such elaboration.
Received on Saturday, 15 November 2014 13:25:50 UTC