- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:36:36 +0100
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 11/03/2014 06:14 PM, James M Snell wrote:
> The "rel" property added to the as:Link is problematic from a data
> modeling point of view, and actually isn't as useful as one might
> imagine in practice.
>
> Based on the current definition of as:Link, here's how it would
> currently be used:
>
> {
> "@context": "http://asjsonld.mybluemix.net",
> "image": {
> "@type": "as:Link",
> "@id": "http://example.org/foo",
> "rel": "preview"
> }
> }
>
> Those familiar with the JSON-LD processing model ought to see the
> problem right away. The "rel" is actually supposed to be a qualified
> relation of the containing object, but as it is defined here, it
> becomes a property of the as:Link itself.
>
> In any case, despite the modeling issues, the "rel" just isn't proving
> to be very valuable in any case I can identify.
>
> My proposal is just to remove it.
+1
in this case, do we have any other reason to keep as:Link?
IMO JSON-LD embedding provides us with all we need to include statements
about objects used as property values
http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#embedding
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 17:38:45 UTC