- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:58:11 -0800
- To: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
- Cc: Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Very well. So the specific recommendation to implementers is essentially: don't do microsyntax-y type things... use either or both structured html and audience targeting/as:tag. Whatever any particular implementation wishes to do beyond that is up to them. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Evan Prodromou writes: > >> On 2014-12-05 09:07 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >>> Once again I think we shouldn't depend on any specific information >>> buried in the raw content. Application which someone uses for human >>> interaction, should generate JSON which includes all the required >>> information in appropriate properties (as:to, as:tag etc.) >> >> +1. >> >> -Evan > > Tack another +1 on there. :) > > I think mentioning what well known services have done in a normative > section is also a-okay. > > - Chris >
Received on Friday, 5 December 2014 18:59:00 UTC