- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 20:46:10 +0100
- To: rektide@voodoowarez.com, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
On 12/04/2014 08:32 PM, rektide@voodoowarez.com wrote: > At what doing to d we return to the Social IG and ask for this to get > added to scope, or does this work remain outside of the Recommendation Track > deliverables? > > http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-wg-charter#scope It's not in the WG list of deliverables. That does not prevent the IG from publishing it as an "IG Note." However, James, could you provide a summary of the overlap with the scope of schema.org, since Google is also considering having that work as either a 'snapshot' or Member Submission? > > On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:33:57AM -0800, James M Snell wrote: >> I've been continuing work on the proposed extended vocabulary... see here: >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Activity_Streams/Expanded_Vocabulary >> [2] http://rawgit.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/extended-vocabulary/activitystreams2.html >> [3] http://rawgit.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/extended-vocabulary/activitystreams2-vocabulary.html >> >> The main thing you'll notice about this is that it's a *big* expansion >> of the vocabulary. The approach has been straightforward: dig through >> a ton of existing social web applications/platforms and identify the >> common artifacts, features, etc and if any particular item shows up in >> at least three separate implementations, it's added to the extended >> vocabulary. The goal here is to make it trivially possible to >> represent the most common social artifacts/actions without requiring a >> dependency on any one "External" vocabulary. >> >> Overlaps with other vocabularies (particularly schema.org/Actions) >> exist in this. Those overlaps are *intentional*. If folks want to use >> schema.org instead, go for it, there's nothing stopping you. Linked >> data mechanisms can be used to connect those together so that >> everything just works. > > Thanks for colliding across namespaces. I really hope something gets better > with Schema.org / w3 's ability to work together soon. >
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2014 19:46:23 UTC