- From: Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:30:10 +0100
- To: public-socialweb-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CA+E-wcKzFhLEaBV1myT_dazQc67ZQ6hj7fbBfe8FHY8FvXN1wA@mail.gmail.com>
The recently published "Activity Vocabulary" https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-activitystreams-vocabulary-20161215/ confused me, as I read the following in the beginning 1. Introduction > The Activity Streams 2.0 Core Syntax defines the JSON syntax for Activity > Streams. This document defines the vocabulary properties. > The *Activity Streams 2.0 Vocabulary* defines a set of abstract types and > properties that describe past, present and future Activities. The > vocabulary is defined in two parts: It is not completely obvious that what I emphasized in the quote above actually refers to *this* document. I.e. that "Activity Vocabulary" == "Activity Streams 2.0 Vocabulary" ! Why not let *this* spec have the full name? At least, the other foundational document, which is here referred to as Activity Streams 2.0 Core Syntax is published with the name Activity Streams 2.0 Not the full name, but at least more specific than for the vocabulary spec. Regards, /olle -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Olle Olsson olleo@sics.se Tel: +46 8 633 15 19 Fax: +46 8 751 72 30 [Svenska W3C-kontoret: olleo@w3.org] SICS [Swedish Institute of Computer Science] Box 1263 SE - 164 29 Kista Sweden ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 19 December 2016 17:30:45 UTC