- From: Michael Vogel <heluecht@pirati.ca>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:22:29 +0100
- To: public-socialweb-comments@w3.org
Hi! Am 19.02.15 um 21:48 schrieb Jason Robinson: > The stories that didn't seem duplicates or related purely to content > delivery technicalities, I've created now: > > * Share content with single individuals > * Profile visibility > * Chat rooms > * Creating web pages > * Moving of identities Thanks! And thanks for not giving in this "I find it hard to believe that the user stories from Friendica will be significantly different"-thinking. Especially this moving of identities seem to be very important. Friendica does this (more badly) but I heard that red does this in a good way. And on decentralized networks it can always happen that your server suddenly discontinues the work. So this is a point that had to be solved. I read in the wiki that you wrote that this needn't to be solved in the first version. Okay, but I think the whole structure should keep this possibility in mind. What I want to say with that: If the system has got the ability of moving profiles between different servers, then the "primary key" can't be an address like user@server.tld but some kind of guid or fingerprint. The address can change over the time - but you would always be befriended to this guid. Michael
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2015 23:22:56 UTC