- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:00:59 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, public-social-web-talk@w3.org
Dan Brickley wrote: > On 23/1/09 18:37, Karl Dubost wrote: >> >> >> Le 23 janv. 2009 à 11:43, Harry Halpin a écrit : >>> 1) Who would join the Social Web XG? Please add if you are a W3C member >>> or not, and if your organization would join W3C. >> >> I would join this XG (if I find an employer who is W3C Member or a an >> employer who would be in favor of joining W3C) > > To be clear, is this just so you have the resources/support you need > to be effective and useful in the group? > > I have no assumption that W3C Membership should be a precondition for > participation in the XG(s). A public list that the public are welcome > to participate in, and telecons open to those without member > affiliation too. I don't care quite how this is cludged/managed in > terms of W3C process; but I really think we'll get nowhere if the > partipation model excludes those many people working outside of W3C. > > Is anyone proposing a Membership-based participation model? Of course not - obviously, this group should be as open as possible, especially given that many relevant people doing this kind of work are not W3C members. At the same time, assessing how many W3C members want to participate in 1 or 2 groups is useful, as charters have to be verified by at least 4 W3C members. I think the 1 XG model has at least 4 members, I'm not sure yet about two XGs. But maybe! > cheers, > > Dan > > -- > http://danbri.org/ >
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 18:01:42 UTC