Re: Poll: Who would join Social Web XG(s)? 1 or 2 XGs? Telecons?

Harry,

> 1) Who would join the Social Web XG? Please add if you are a W3C member
> or not, and if your organization would join W3C.

I would. Yes. Yes.

> 2) Would you prefer one or two XGs? One XG focused on interoperability
> between exisiting work on the social web, and another focused on Best
> Practices? Or should these be done as one XG?

Two XGs. From my experience in XGs (MMSEM and RDB2RDF) I can tell it is
better to stay focused with a small group ;)

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html


> From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:43:17 +0000
> To: <public-social-web-talk@w3.org>
> Subject: Poll: Who would join Social Web XG(s)? 1 or 2 XGs? Telecons?
> Resent-From: <public-social-web-talk@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:43:52 +0000
> 
> 
> Two quick questions - please respond to list if possible!
> 
> 1) Who would join the Social Web XG? Please add if you are a W3C member
> or not, and if your organization would join W3C.
> 
> 2) Would you prefer one or two XGs? One XG focused on interoperability
> between exisiting work on the social web, and another focused on Best
> Practices? Or should these be done as one XG?
> 
> 3) Regardless of one or two XGs, different telecons but same listserv to
> facilitate communication? Or one telecon?
> 
> I'm trying to get a head count here.
> 
>     thanks,
> 
>           -harry
>

Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 16:47:23 UTC