- From: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:47:39 +1000
- To: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
On 11 Feb 2009, at 09:03, Harry Halpin wrote: > Also, it may be educational to look other Incubator Group's charters. > See Emergency Interoperability Incubator Group [1] and Rich Web > Backplane Incubator Group [2]. Well spotted Harry...As a co-chair for one of these XGs, I can say quite categorically that we are better off scoping small. This does not mean we cannot decide to do other work (once the XG is up) but my experience is that there is a lot of euphoria at the beginning, then there is a large plateau of silence... I have already expressed strong support [1] for a charter based around the fundamentals of interoperability for social networks. For the Privacy/Trust work, I suggested that this be done in collaboration with the existing W3C Policy IG (PLING) [2] for the very real reason that this group already has this experience and expertise (its an open group so anyone can join) and have an existing concrete liaison with the PrimeLife Project, which has just produced its Requirements document [3] on Policies (aka Privacy, Trust, Identification, Rights) where Social Networks are one of the key Use Cases. It makes sense to build on this work with a joint PLING/XG report. Cheers... Dr Renato Iannella Principal Scientist, National ICT Australia (NICTA) Level 5, Axon Building #47, Staff House Rd, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, AUSTRALIA [research] http://spin.nicta.org.au [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-social-web-talk/2009Feb/0020.html > [2] <http://www.w3.org/Policy/pling/wiki/Main_Page> [3] <http://www.primelife.eu/images/stories/deliverables/h5.1.1-policy_requirements-public.pdf >
Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 06:48:53 UTC