- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:21:47 +0000
- To: Tim Anglade <tim.anglade@af83.com>
- Cc: public-social-web-talk@w3.org
Hi, Le 3 févr. 09 à 19:16, Tim Anglade a écrit : > > Dear workshop participants, position paper submitters, interested > parties… > > Following the vote and the concerns expressed on each side, a > unified Draft Charter proposal, merging the two previous Incubator > Group proposals, is now ready for you to visit [1] > It is structured as a single Incubator Group with several focused > Task Forces inside of it. As mentionned in the previous thread, I'm afraid that such a group won't be productive. Maybe I'm wrong - but I difficultly believe that a monthly call when we need to talk about 7 task forces and 15 deliverables between (let's say) 20/30 people can be useful and realistic. > > > In the process of re-crafting this charter, those of us working on > it took the opportunity to fold in some discussions which were not > in either of the charters but might still be of interest to some in > this large group. For example, Distributed Architectures and User > Experiences. The result is that the new charter is now larger than > the sum of the original two. I'm sure that each topics is interesting considering a global 'social Web' picture. But do you think that in the same monthly telecon we can talk about business models, user-interfaces, dataportability, privacy, etc. in a productive way ? On the other hand, I agree that some topics overlap, for instance the privacy and Harry's taskforce share common action items. BTW, is that voluntary ? (I mean that kind of joint task-forces ?) > > > Please come and check it out. > > If this exercise is going to work we need everyone's participation > and comments. That means, don't hesitate to start debating a section > about which you feel passionate or to edit or add yourself into the > work plan! > > > The rules are simple No Editor => No Deliverable => No Task Force. > (Let's hope it won't go the extra step: => No XG) So please add/ > remove/edit the Deliverables, Task Forces, and the whole wiki page > away. > Due to the current charter and if we consider a single telecon, I'm afraid I won't participate actively - not because I'm not interested in the issue, but because I really want such an XG to do concrete actions / deliverables / etc and not sure the current proposal can achieve it. Yet, in case there's alternative ways, either various XG, or task- force focused management, I'd be happy to *actively* contribute to some of the deliverables (i.e. co-edit / author). But in that case, I strongly suggest that each task-force conduct a weekly meeting in short committee and that taskforces leaders / deliverables editors have then a monthly telecon - that's certainly more work, but I guess more productive. (is that still in the spirit of an XG or does it sound more like an IG ?) Best, Alex. > Cheers, > Tim > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/UnifiedSocialXG > > - - - - - - - > Tim Anglade | directeur, pôle « Turbulences » | af83 > 42, boulevard de Sébastopol | 75003 Paris | France > 1436, Howard St | San Francisco | CA 94103 | USA > Tel : +33 1 42 72 33 32 > Mob : +33 6 35 92 77 58 > skype : tim_anglade > Web : www.af83.com > > This email is: [X] bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private > > > > > > > > -- Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2009 23:22:30 UTC