- From: Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 19:10:05 +0000
- To: Owen Shepherd <owen.shepherd@e43.eu>, Dave Wilkinson <wilkie@xomb.org>
- CC: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>, "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <a2c7f466281045ffb4a6fda91ee35a81@XCH15-01-04.nw.nos.boeing.com>
We need to come to consensus on which IRC channel the IG will use for meetings. There have been conflicting opinions. Personally, I'm fine with using either #social or #socialig for meeting minutes. I think I slightly favor hanging out in #social .... but scribing the IG minutes in #socialig. Seems a bit "cleaner" to me. But I don't really care. Tantek spoke for all in #social; Owen speaks here for #socialig for minutes; ... others? Maybe we'll have to discuss this again in the WG meeting next week? -- Ann From: Owen Shepherd [mailto:owen.shepherd@e43.eu] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 10:03 AM To: Dave Wilkinson; Bassetti, Ann Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org; public-social-interest@w3.org Subject: Re: combine IRC channels? This is something I like in general - the IG and WG are really working on the same thing, and it'd be good to increase the communication between us. I'm also in favor of continuing to use #socialig for meetings, however, as it seems that SocialWG discussions have a tendency to spill over into IG meeting periods (as was demonstrated during the last IG meeting, for example) - Owen On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:55 PM Dave Wilkinson <wilkie@xomb.org<mailto:wilkie@xomb.org>> wrote: I think this is a great idea! Almost obviously so. The room should be more #social, after all. :) On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com<mailto:ann.bassetti@boeing.com>> wrote: Hello Social WG Folks – QUESTION: The Social IG would like to know if it would be OK to combine the IRC channels. IOW, instead of having both #social and #socialig, we would all use #social. I brought this up in IRC last week: (http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-05-29 ). In general, except for scribing during meetings, the #socialig channel is very quiet. Thus we thought it would be good synergy to use the same channel. ISSUE: might be if WG folks want to discuss something during the 1 hour IG call (Wednesdays; 15:00 UTC) – then there would be chatter in channel unrelated to the meeting being scribed, or people would have to wait, or open a new channel. ALTERNATIVE: would be for us to use the #socialig channel ONLY for scribing meetings, but hang out in #social for normal day-to-day chat. As you'll see in the log (link, above), @cwebber2 and @aaronpk both thought it would be OK. Although with a question about the chat-during-meeting that I raise above. I think I prefer the "alternative", wherein we use #socialig only for meetings. What do the rest of you think? This question / suggestion is part of the item elf added to today's WG agenda (https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-06-02#Coordination_with_IG ). Thanks – Ann, for the IG
Received on Thursday, 4 June 2015 19:10:49 UTC