Re: combine IRC channels?

I think this is a great idea! Almost obviously so. The room should be more
#social, after all. :)

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
wrote:

>  Hello Social WG Folks –
>
>
>
> QUESTION:  The Social IG would like to know if it would be OK to combine
> the IRC channels.  IOW, instead of having both #social and #socialig, we
> would all use #social.  I brought this up in IRC last week: (
> http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2015-05-29 ).
>
>
>
> In general, except for scribing during meetings, the #socialig channel is
> very quiet. Thus we thought it would be good synergy to use the same
> channel.
>
>
>
> ISSUE:  might be if WG folks want to discuss something during the 1 hour
> IG call (Wednesdays; 15:00 UTC) – then there would be chatter in channel
> unrelated to the meeting being scribed, or people would have to wait, or
> open a new channel.
>
>
>
> ALTERNATIVE:  would be for us to use the #socialig channel ONLY for
> scribing meetings, but hang out in #social for normal day-to-day chat.
>
>
>
> As you'll see in the log (link, above), @cwebber2 and @aaronpk both
> thought it would be OK. Although with a question about the
> chat-during-meeting that I raise above. I think I prefer the "alternative",
> wherein we use #socialig only for meetings. What do the rest of you think?
>
>
>
> This question / suggestion is part of the item elf added to today's WG
> agenda (https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/2015-06-02#Coordination_with_IG
> ).
>
>
>
> Thanks – Ann, for the IG
>