- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:26:40 +0200
- To: "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
- Cc: "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLUp+rGUfpYW6xuN7Vo3DmuVj+SnSXmjBRNp1+WMfRYgQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 8 July 2015 at 01:27, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com> wrote: > Hi All – > > > > Apologies for sending this so late... I have created an agenda for > tomorrow's meeting: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/2015-07-08 > > > > Since there is not much else on the agenda, I propose to use the meeting > to work on the use cases with minor objections, starting with those that > have been added to GitHub: > https://github.com/w3c-social/social-ucr/issues > > > > I am also sending this note to the WG. Since we cannot actually resolve > the objections without the original objectors (who are mostly in the WG, > but not in the IG). If any of these people who had objections could > attend, it would be valuable. I realize this is very late notice, so no > worries if you can't make it. > Thanks, I joined. > > > · *User posts a note with embedded media: *Ben Roberts, James > Snell, Bill Looby, Aaron Parecki, elf, Tantek, Chris Webber > > · *User posts a file: *Andreas Kuckartz, Kevin Marks, > > · *Groups:* Aaron Parecki, Kevin Marks, Bret Comnes, Tantek > > · *Reshare Ridesharing Demand:* <many objections, stating this > user story is a duplicate of "2.12 Responses" > > · *Profile Management*: Tantek > Re profile managment there's 13 +1s Only negative comment (+0) was from tantek (who I think does not want to use the mailing list) Can I note that we demoed a live implementation of this at the F2F using SoLiD. Furthermore, the platform was expressive enough that we could add 'hometown' without any new code introduced to the system. The object from tantek is along the lines of "twitter doesnt have home town, so we should not". I dont think this is an ideal philosophy. Social web silos are empowered by the developers. A real social web should empower users. The essence of this use case is very important, in that users are able to express the aspects of themselves that THEY choose, not that the developers choose. > > > We meet at: > > - Wednesdays at 15:00 UTC > > which is equivalent to: > > - Central Europe: 17:00 > - England, Scotland, Ireland: 16:00 > - Eastern USA: 11:00 > - Central USA: 10:00 > - Pacific USA: 8:00 > > Let's get this ball rolling! -- Ann >
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 08:27:11 UTC