- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 23:00:11 +0100
- To: "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: legal issues with two groups sharing the same IRC channel? Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:22:18 -0500 From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> Organization: W3C To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, elf >> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> Hi Harry, Elf, and Arnaud, I don't see a legal problem with sharing the irc channel between the IG and WG. Indeed, many groups operating in public have a practice of allowing anyone who is identified to listen to WG meetings. The chairs and team are responsible for watching that contributions to rec-track documents come only from WG Participants, see http://www.w3.org/2003/12/22-pp-faq#non-participants If we expect non-WG-participants to be around and possibly speaking during WG discussions, you may want to remind people of the patent policy's goals and ask them not to interject (or to get patent commitments from those where you want contributions). Hope that helps, --Wendy On 01/21/2015 12:36 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: > Arnaud thought this was possible. Of course, anyone can join IRC so it's > hard to see how we could enforce IPR commits (unlike with mailing > lists). Is this a concern? > > cheers, > harry > -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 22:00:21 UTC