- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:43:11 +0100
- To: Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- CC: public-social-interest@w3.org
Daniel, Your questions are already answered by the clear and straightforward process the WG is having: i.e. create user stories, vote, and then use those that have been voted on to create the requirements needed to measure candidates against: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API (note we are running 1 week behind schedule) I understand its a lot of info, but I would recommend you read previous minutes and the mailing list, but I'm happy to answer any question on the call. The charter lists one API and one protocol (since federation typically requires more than an API). Since no actual candidates have been put forward yet, arguing over one or two APIs is prematurely optimizing until a single API can be put forward. cheers, harry On 02/18/2015 05:29 PM, Daniel Harris wrote: > On 18 Feb 2015, at 15:58, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: >> On 02/18/2015 04:56 PM, Harry Halpin wrote: >>> Yes, there are a lot of regrets, but we can just connect and make it a >>> very short meeting if there's isn't quorum. >> ok, we hear each other in ~1h! > > Yes, I like the sound of that. I'd like to get some realtime feedback on my questions: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-social-interest/2015Feb/thread.html#msg51 > > Cheers Daniel >
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 16:43:22 UTC