Re: Implementations (former: User stories for Social API)

> On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:59, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:
> 
> On 02/11/2015 05:01 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote:
>> On 2015-02-11 04:56 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
>>> I don't think that it is appropriate that the User Stories page
>>> contain an implementation section.
>> You're right, it's not.
>> 
>> Elf Pavlik, I moved your groupings and implementations sections to
>> sub-pages.
> I needed to add back to *please* list a warning that changing stories
> names will break links from groupings!
> * do not rename stories! it will break links pointing to them from
> groupings.
> 
>> 
>> The stories are supposed to be flat and simple.
> 
> I don't understand why do you encourage adding comments and discussions
> under stories, but at the same time you don't accept adding a *single
> line* which includes links back to relevant Gropings/Tags, mostly just
> made out of a single word or even an acronym.

Btw, grouping stories under headers does not change the links to the
stories. It seems that some of the groupings we had at the beginning of
the week made it easier to read the stories, than just a flat listing
as there is now.

> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Saturday, 14 February 2015 09:12:10 UTC