Re: as:Like (a rdfs:Class) or as:like (a rdf:Property) ?

On 08/27/2015 08:46 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> With as:like, as:view, as:read etc. we could do the same to filter
> activity.verb.include('like') or activity.action.includes('like')
> 
> But could *also use them* for labels in edges of direct relations, for
> values of property in qualified relations, and for values of verb/action
> in activities!
> 
> I hope that clarifies my argument :)

I just -1 pull request (191) which starts adding various isFoo types of
relationships. And suggested again approach I explained here.
https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/191