Re: Update from Social WG call yesterday

Arnaud,

Thanks for the clarification on Tantek's point. I agree the point was about
examples, not really about if Actions are needed at all.

Our IG meeting today was cancelled and the next one was suggested for next
Wed, so after the next WG meeting.  We have 18 Use Cases to sift through
here
 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Use_Case_TF/Social_Data_Syntax/Profile_Scenarios
<http://IG Task For Use Cases>

Would people be able to meet at 10am PST / 1 PM EST (etc.) on Monday to
start making a run at the list?  TPAC is just the next week after that
anyway.  If others can meet earlier the group should, though I can't be
there.

Lloyd



Lloyd Fassett
Azteria Inc.
Bend, OR
(541) 848-2440 (PST)

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Lloyd,
>
> Thanks for making sure the IG is aware.
> The problem isn't so much that there isn't a clear use case for Actions as
> much as that none has been documented. Tantek argued that the WG shouldn't
> promote a spec without documented the use cases it addresses which I think
> is a fair criticism. So, it would be very helpful if the IG could document
> some. It may be that there already some out there somewhere we can just
> point to.
>
> Regards.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM
> Software Group
>
>
> Lloyd Fassett <lloyd@azteria.com> wrote on 10/15/2014 11:09:43 AM:
>
> > From: Lloyd Fassett <lloyd@azteria.com>
> > To: "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
> > Date: 10/15/2014 11:10 AM
> > Subject: Update from Social WG call yesterday
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I attended the WG call yesterday and they are really interested in
> > the Use Case(s).  I told them that we didn't expect to have the work
> > till close to TPAC. A particular issue is coming up now about
> > Actions in the AS2.0 spec where there isn't a clear use case on why
> > we need them or not.
> >
> > Personally, I think the actions are central to what 'social' means
> > by any definition.  As we work through the scenarios though, that's
> > one item in particular that is of interest to the WG.
> >
> > Lloyd Fassett
> > Azteria Inc.
> > Bend, OR
> > (541) 848-2440 (PST)
>