- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:48:31 +0200
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>, "Crawford, Mark" <mark.crawford@sap.com>
- CC: "internal-socbizcg@w3.org" <internal-socbizcg@w3.org>, "public-social-interest@w3.org" <public-social-interest@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/20/2014 04:45 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> The Social WG is bound by tighter IP rules than that of the
>> Social IG,
>
> Really? I was not aware of that.
>
>> In terms of Use Cases, the Social WG is focused on use cases for
>> their specific charter items which are very narrow in scope as
>> compared to our broader scope and I therefore expect broader use
>> cases in line with that scope. Yes, there may be some overlap,
>> but I would rather have the overlap than miss out on an important
>> aspect of what I expect we will be addressing.
>
> I do agree that no aspects (even seemingly unimportant ones) should
> be missed. But the use cases of the Social WG are all automatically
> also relevant for the Social Web IG (at least that is my POV).
>
> So the more general question is: How can the WG and the IG
> collaborate without unnecessarily duplicating work, copying content
> or spending time on synchronizing two separate sets of Use Cases
> where one is essentially a subset of the other one?
>
Since the WG is not doing use-cases and the use-case document is not
Rec-track and thus doesn't have test-cases and IPR commits on Rec. The
use-case doc should come out of the IG.
Hope that clarifies things!
yours,
harry
> Maybe a Wiki page is not even the most appropriate tool..
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)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=1EN9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2014 15:48:36 UTC