Re: My notes on the charter document

Hi:

I will only point out that on the overview when is refered about use cases
executed across office/desktop scenarios as well as mobile and cloud, I
would say that despite the infrastructure on top the interaction occurs can
constraints execution, human nature interaction remains the same. Thus I
would prefer keep the use cases "open" rather than link it to particular
infrastructure where the interaction is taking place.

Regards

Alberto Manuel

No dia 24 de Fevereiro de 2012 22:07, David Robinson
<robinsda@us.ibm.com>escreveu:

> Evan,
>
> Great feedback on the charter.
>
> 1) While I'm not opposed to spinning off new groups for certain use cases,
> I think we need to do that with some caution.  There is some synergy to be
> gained if we work the use cases in one place, in my opinion.  There are
> probably areas of overlap that might be missed if everything spins off into
> a separate group.  The community group process, I believe, allows for task
> forces, or other sorts of things, and creating "tasks forces" as sub-groups
> of the socbiz community group might be one way to achieve both a focused
> goal as well as maintaining synergy by working on once place.
>
> 2) Agree.  I like the idea of rolling work products.  We should still set
> goals for ourselves, even if it is to produce 1 use case by May (that is
> only an example).  If there is better wording that makes this clearer, we
> should put it in if all agree.
>
> 3) Agree.  Any suggestions on better working to add  the idea of
> practitioners into the charter in a stronger way ?
>
>
>
> |------------>
> | From:      |
> |------------>
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net>
>                                                                            |
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | To:        |
> |------------>
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |public-socbizcg@w3.org
>                                                                            |
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | Date:      |
> |------------>
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |02/21/2012 02:06 PM
>                                                                           |
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | Subject:   |
> |------------>
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  |My notes on the charter document
>                                                                          |
>
>  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
> Everyone,
>
> Thanks for a good kick-off meeting -- short, sweet, and to the point. My
> favorite kind.
>
> I'd like to share my thoughts on the charter. Overall, it reflects my
> expectations for the group, but I have some specific ppints.
>    1.   I'd like to suggest that when we think a use case is a priority, or
>       an area of interest is a priority, we take the initiative to start
>      new groups to focus on those issues. For example: we've identified in
>      the Social Jam a need for work around social analytics. It may make
>      sense for the socbiz group to spin that out as a separate effort, and
>      monitor its success.
>    2.   I think that this group can be most useful if we keep it open on a
>       rolling basis. I think that's the intent from an undefined closing
>      date. We may want to make it specific that our "Deliverables" won't
>      be delivered in a big binder at the end of 18 months, but rather as a
>      continuing stream of produced works.
>    3.   One of the strengths of this group, as far as I can tell, is its
>       emphasis on practitioners inside enterprises (rather than just
>      vendors). I wonder if we could find ways to support that in the
>      charter?
> That's what I've got right now. Otherwise, it looks real good!
>
> -Evan
> --
> Evan Prodromou, CEO and Founder, StatusNet Inc.
> 1124 rue Marie-Anne Est #32, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2J 2B7
> E: evan@status.net P: +1-514-554-3826
>
>
>
>