- From: Alberto Manuel <bpm.tst@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 08:14:53 +0000
- To: "Krebs, Edward (E.C.)" <ekrebs@ford.com>
- Cc: "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>, "public-socbizcg@w3.org" <public-socbizcg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMR6YEbe6ZWN2aK3Rs6O4g153iPvEogynZKX=2uQBsGqry+5zA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi: Here is a list of social technology that can be involved in the workshop: Hojoki Acquia Igloo Jive Saba Atlassian 2012/12/5 Krebs, Edward (E.C.) <ekrebs@ford.com> > As an IT architect, this thread brings up an interesting observation. > Last year, Gartner noted that the social business software market was, at > the enterprise level, somewhat steady with the same players as the previous > year. They also noted that the predominant market was in the > horizontal/platform arena. **** > > ** ** > > This year we saw an explosion of domain/vertical specific applications. > For example, Vuuch is very project management, Product Development focused. > ITinvolve is focused solely on IT service desk types of use cases. **** > > ** ** > > The social business strategists and architects I talk to in many companies > will struggle with this, and it’s going to take years for the market to > settle out. Complicating this is a race by some companies to add a social > component into their existing product. As an example, IBM’s new BPM > software version has a social discussion widget. It does NOT even integrate > with their own IBM Connections product, much less consider how you would > substitute and integrate your company’s current solution. **** > > ** ** > > In my opinion, it won’t make sense for a company to buy 20 different > social business technologies – it will be hard to be “social” and do it in > silos! On the other hand, as I mentioned during my cascade of our social > business framework, there can’t be one solution either.**** > > ** ** > > This suggests that beyond the corporate (user) side of the equation, > having robust discussion with providers that offer vertical and those > offering horizontal platforms involved may get to insight on how these > disparate systems ought to play together. **** > > ** ** > > To contribute to the original question, I’ve had this interoperability > conversation with IBM, Yammer/Microsoft, Jive, Tibbr, SocialCast, Cisco and > have it on my list to talk with SalesForce since our financial company uses > them. Most are on board, several are involved in the W3C standards work. > Yammer is/was not, we’re pushing Microsoft to change their mind. > Interestingly, in the two vertical cases of ITinvolve and Vuuch that I > talked to, neither were interested in how they’ll play in an overall > corporate social business architecture and strategy (although a funny > ITinvolve salesperson tried to tell me their platform could/should be our > corporate solution!) . To me this suggests we need to get more > visibility/discussion with and around these domain specific type providers > around the business need and opportunities for standards-driven > architectures. **** > > ** ** > > Regards, > Edward C. Krebs > Enterprise Architect, Advanced IT and Research > Enterprise Technologies > Ford Motor Company Information Technology **** > > *Quote of the day:* > "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." --* Alan Kay* **** > > ** ** > > *From:* sfermigier@gmail.com [mailto:sfermigier@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Stéfane > Fermigier > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 05, 2012 2:44 AM > > *To:* Bassetti, Ann > *Cc:* public-socbizcg@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: social business "players"**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com> > wrote:**** > > Hey, Stéfane – that's really excellent! Sorry to say, I have never heard > of any of them. **** > > ** ** > > That's the main issue most french software vendors have, unfortunately. ** > ** > > **** > > Just goes to show how much variation there is in the world. I feel > strongly, if we hold a workshop, we need to figure out how to pull many of > these threads together.**** > > ** ** > > Indeed. **** > > **** > > What's your view on the W3C holding a workshop in this subject area? If > you think we should, what do you think the 'theme' or focus should be?**** > > ** ** > > I'm don't have a wide enough view of the issues at hand, at least one of > them that is of interest to me is the question around standards (and the > fact that there are so many of them to choose from...).**** > > ** ** > > As one of the organisers (and program vice-chairs) of the Open World Forum > 2013 (see http://www.openworldforum.org/en for the 2012 edition) I guess > that a workshop on "Open standards for the social business web" would be > perfectly appropriate in this context, but maybe it's a bit too far in the > future (OWF2013 will take place in October 2013).**** > > ** ** > > S.**** > > ** ** > > **** > > -- Ann **** > > **** > > *From:* Stéfane Fermigier [mailto:sfermigier@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Stefane > Fermigier > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 04, 2012 11:02 PM > *To:* Bassetti, Ann > *Cc:* public-socbizcg@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: social business "players"**** > > **** > > Ann,**** > > **** > > FYI, here's a list of French companies creating soclal business > applications:**** > > **** > > - Abilian (my company)**** > > - Azendoo**** > > - Jalios**** > > - Jamespot**** > > - Knowings**** > > - Knowledge‐Plaza**** > > - SeeMy**** > > -TalkSpirit**** > > - XWiki**** > > - Yoolink**** > > **** > > Here's a list of french consultancies around social business:**** > > **** > > - Lecko**** > > - NextModernity**** > > **** > > These are the people we regularly hear from in France.**** > > **** > > Here's also a list of professional events happening in Paris around social > business:**** > > **** > > - E2.0 Summit Paris (http://www.e20summit.de/)**** > > **** > > (OK it's a bit short at this point, I may be missing some information).*** > * > > **** > > Regards,**** > > **** > > S.**** > > **** > > On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:32 AM, Bassetti, Ann wrote:**** > > ** ** > > Hi All –**** > > **** > > Thinking about the kinds of companies or people we might want to attract > to a Soc Biz Workshop, I searched on "social business" (duh!). Very quick > searches; by no means comprehensive nor representative, turns up examples > such as:**** > > **** > > · An event held in Europe last summer: > http://www.socialbusinessforum.com/category/speakers/ (Just to give a > broad list of people who have apparently stood up in public and promoted > these ideas.) Appears that event was probably sponsored by an org called > OpenKnowledge, who says they are an international company specialized in > Social Business Design: http://www.open-knowledge.it/en**** > > **** > > · Another similar event – "Social Business Summit" > http://www.socialbusinesssummit.com/ sponsored by the Dachis Group, a > self-described "social marketing optimization software solutions leader" > http://www.dachisgroup.com/about-us/ . I note that IBM is a big sponsor > of both of those events.**** > > **** > > Companies we regularly hear from are: IBM, Microsoft, Cisco, Salesforce, > Jive, Yammer (now owned by Microsoft). Sorry, Mark, I probably wouldn't be > in a position to hear if SAP is ringing our bells... likely they are! Look > also at the list of sponsors for the first event to get ideas of others.** > ** > > **** > > My main point is, there is a LOT of activity going on regarding "social > business". Who are the key participants, opinion makers and users we want > to attract? How will we snag them? What do they need, from a standards > point-of-view? Those examples represent some European and American > situations. What's going on elsewhere? etc... **** > > **** > > There's so much more to know and consider than the teeny bits we've talked > about. Part of feeling more comfortable with promoting a workshop is to do > some of that research.**** > > **** > > -- Ann**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > -- > Stefane Fermigier, tech entrepreneur > http://fermigier.com/ - http://twitter.com/sfermigier - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/sfermigier > "Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin > "There's no such thing as can't. You always have a choice." - Ken Gor**** > > **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > -- > Stefane Fermigier, tech entrepreneur > http://fermigier.com/ - http://twitter.com/sfermigier - > http://www.linkedin.com/in/sfermigier > "Well done is better than well said." - Benjamin Franklin > "There's no such thing as can't. You always have a choice." - Ken Gor**** > -- Alberto Manuel http://ultrabpm.wordpress.com/ http://pt.linkedin.com/in/albertomanuel
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 08:22:04 UTC