Re: ACTION-247: Review testcases to remove or re-classify the testcases that are not required for compliance

Hi Matthew,

I'm taking on Derek's ACTION-262 as I said I would do.

On 12/13/11 5:18 PM, Matthew Golby-Kirk wrote:
> All,
>
> Under Action-247 [1] I have reviewed the test suite for SOAP-JMS. All 
> tests are already marked as "*Optional*" or "*Required*", which is 
> good, but a few tests appear to be marked incorrectly.
>
> *test0008 *is marked as *Optional *but I believe it should be marked 
> as *Required *as the client will always have an environment in which 
> it is running. However, if we decide this should remain *Optional*, 
> then *test0017 *should also become *Optional *as this test also 
> requires the use of the client environment.

I conclude that test0017 should be optional, because there's no 
normative requirement in the specification that a client must support an 
"environment" that affects the configuration of the JMS binding for 
SOAP. So I don't think we can require this test.

>
> *test0009 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked 
> as *Optional *as it uses WSDL 1.1 properties like *test0006 *which is 
> already marked as an *Optional *test.
>
> *test0010 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked 
> as *Optional *as it uses WSDL 1.1 properties like *test0006 *which is 
> already marked as an *Optional *test.
>
> *test0018 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked 
> as *Optional *as it requires the use of a topic which I understand is 
> *Optional *in the spec.
>
> *test0019 *is marked as *Required*, but I believe it should be marked 
> as *Optional *as it requires the use of a topic which I understand is 
> *Optional *in the spec.

Agreed.

-Eric.

>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Matthew
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/247

Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 22:17:44 UTC