W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Two SOAP/JMS items - changing meeting time, moving to PR

From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:35:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4E492E9E.2070305@tibco.com>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Hi Yves,

On 7/25/11 9:29 PM, Yves Lafon wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Eric Johnson wrote:
>> Hi Yves,
>> In an email exchange we had a little while back, you suggested doing 
>> another CR.
>> I think, after this past Tuesday's meeting, we may be ready for a PR.
>> We have two implemtations now that assert that they can pass test 
>> cases (and I think we may have a third shortly).
>> Note that we've not properly tested these implementations with each 
>> other, just that they've independently looked at the test cases, and 
>> assessed that they pass them.
>> Can we move to PR? Or do we need more than that?
> We need to ensure that it matches what was promised in terms of 
> testing (it should be in the exit criteria of the previous CR), I'll 
> check that later this week.

Did you ever get around to checking this text to see if what we're 
suggesting is consistent with moving to PR? I looked at the SOTD text 
from our last CR just now, and it appeared that moving forward with PR 
is consistent with what we stated there.

We said:
"The Working Group intend to submit this document for consideration as a 
W3C Proposed Recommendation after 31 August 2009 having met the 
following criteria:

     At least two implementations have demonstrated interoperability of 
each feature.

     All issues raised during the CR period against this document have 
received formal responses.

This specification is not describing the way the binding could be used 
with WSDL 1.1 WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 WSDL 2.0 Core Language, due to lack 
of support in the Working Group. As a consequence, the description of 
how to deal with WSDL 1.1 or 2.0 MEPs will be moved to the Working 
Group's FAQ."

Since we removed the WSDL 2.0 feature, and both Software AG and the 
Apache CXF project assert support for the WSDL 1.1 support, that pretty 
much covers it, at least as I read it.

Your thoughts?

Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 14:43:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:24:49 UTC