- From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:45:10 -0700
- To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Follow-up note from Daniel Kulp - looks like Protocol-2070 is tested in CXF. -Eric. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Question for CXF developers - level of support for W3C SOAP/JMS specification Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:49:59 -0400 From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> To: <dev@cxf.apache.org> CC: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>, Peter Easton <peaston@progress.com> On Monday 18 April 2011 6:22:57 PM Eric Johnson wrote: > > Looking at the test suite itself: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/systests/transports/src/test/ja > > va/org/apache/cxf/jms/testsuite/testcases > > Oh, excellent - I hadn't actually noticed where those were in the source > tree. Looks like they moved slightly: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/trunk/systests/transport-jms/src/test/j > ava/org/apache/cxf/jms/testsuite/services/ Yea. The JMS stuff was split out a week or so ago to help reduce some build times and dependency things and such. Glad you found it. :-) > > I do see some tests that are missing from the official suite: > > http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html > > > > What I DON'T know is if the features tested by those tests are not > > implemented in CXF or just not tested or possibly tested as part of one > > of the other tests. If anyone would like to fill those in, I'd be > > happy to review and apply any patches. > > That, in and of itself is useful - some of those tests don't matter, > because they don't address portions of the specification that are > normative (we "demoted" the WSDL 2.0 support, because we didn't > anticipate two interoperable versions.) > > I did a cross-reference on all those tests, and it looks like the one > we're missing is Protocol-2070 Well, the good news is that I believe it is already supported. If you look in rt/transports/jms/src/test/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/jms/uri/JMSEndpointTest.java in method testReplyToNameParameters there are some tests for testing to make sure the topicReplyToName and such are properly set on the endpoint and the class: rt/transports/jms/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/transport/jms/uri/JMSEndpointParser.java does parse those attributes. Thus, I'm "pretty sure" it already works. Obviously a real test would be great. :-) -- Daniel Kulp dkulp@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 17:45:47 UTC