public-soap-jms@w3.org from November 2010 by date

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

• Minutes 2010-11-30 Mark Phillips
• Action-229 complete Phil Adams
• Action-227: complete Phil Adams

Monday, 29 November 2010

• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Amelia A Lewis
• Proposal to resolve ISSUE-65, complete ACTION-228 Eric Johnson
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Eric Johnson
• Agenda for the 2010-11-30 conference call Eric Johnson

Tuesday, 23 November 2010

• Re: JMS header properties example code Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-68 (Bad JMS example): Broken JMS header properties example code [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: ISSUE-67: Need a SOAP 1.2-specific SOAP/JMS transport URL value [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] Peter Easton
• Re: ISSUE-67: Need a SOAP 1.2-specific SOAP/JMS transport URL value [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] Eric Johnson

Monday, 22 November 2010

• Re: ISSUE-67: Need a SOAP 1.2-specific SOAP/JMS transport URL value [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] Phil Adams
• Re: ISSUE-67: Need a SOAP 1.2-specific SOAP/JMS transport URL value [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] Eric Johnson
• Finally nailed down language for IANA section Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-67: Need a SOAP 1.2-specific SOAP/JMS transport URL value [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• Reminder: no call tomorrow, 2010-11-23 Eric Johnson
• JMS header properties example code Andrew Kennedy

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

• Minutes 2010-11-16 Mark Phillips
• ACTION-225 open Apply Action-219 changes to test spec Peter Easton

Monday, 15 November 2010

• Agenda for the 2010-11-16 conference call Eric Johnson
• ISSUE-66 (Test case cleanup): Missing test for Protocol 2070, references to WSDLUsage assertions from various test cases [SOAP-JMS Test cases] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 11 November 2010

• RE: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Amy Lewis
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Eric Johnson
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Jean-Baptiste Bugeaud

Wednesday, 10 November 2010

• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Yves Lafon
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Eric Johnson

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

• ISSUE-65 (EXI compatibility): Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Amelia A Lewis
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Jean-Baptiste Bugeaud
• regrets for today Phil Adams
• Re: Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Amelia A Lewis
• ACTION-219: Check the test cases are up to date Peter Easton
• Re: Agenda for the 2010-11-09 conference call Mark Phillips

Monday, 8 November 2010

• Allow EXI as characterization for XML in the JMS body ? Jean-Baptiste Bugeaud
• ACTION-220 - review of the FAQ Eric Johnson
• Agenda for the 2010-11-09 conference call Eric Johnson

Monday, 1 November 2010

• Agenda for the 2010-11-02 conference call. Eric Johnson
• My ACTION-181 - complete Eric Johnson

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 November 2010 18:09:20 UTC