- From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:07:32 -0700
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Silly me. I didn't include CVS diffs for handy reference: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.17&r2=text&tr2=1.18&f=h http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.xml.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.14&r2=text&tr2=1.15&f=h -Eric. On 03/15/2010 04:01 PM, Eric Johnson wrote: > >From Phil's email: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Mar/0003.html > > On 03/01/2010 05:17 PM, Phil Adams wrote: > >> Protocol-3002: no testcases currently reference this assertion, but in >> reality all the existing testcases that deal with WSDL-based >> properties should be changed to refer to this assertion (6, 7, 9, 10, >> 13, 14, 15, 16); recommendation is that we change those testcases >> accordingly. >> >> > Consequently, I went through the test cases as Phil noted and added > references to WSDLUsage-3002, where such entries were not there already. > > This concludes my work for > http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/143 > > -Eric. > > >
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 23:08:12 UTC