- From: Phil Adams <phil_adams@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:38:50 -0600
- To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
- Cc: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org>, public-soap-jms-request@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 00:39:26 UTC
Eric, I think the information in the "Message Flows" section of each of those testcases needs to be updated as well. They both still refer to the "old" replyToName value. Phil From: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> To: SOAP-JMS <public-soap-jms@w3.org> Date: 03/01/2010 05:56 PM Subject: ACTION-142 - updated test cases Sent by: public-soap-jms-request@w3.org As per http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/142 I've updated: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0006 and http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0007 by removing the replyToName from the binding elements. In the case of test0006, I updated "GoodReplyQueue" to "AReplyQueue". In the case of test0007, I added an identical entry to the updated test0006. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html.diff?f=h&r1=text&tr1=1.16&r2=text&tr2=1.15&f=h -Eric.
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 00:39:26 UTC