ISSUE-52 (bogus RFC 2119 keyword in table describing JMSReplyTo): JMSReplyTo description includes inappropriate use of "must" in section 2.6.1.1 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

ISSUE-52 (bogus RFC 2119 keyword in table describing JMSReplyTo): JMSReplyTo description includes inappropriate use of "must" in section 2.6.1.1 [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/52

Raised by: Eric Johnson
On product: SOAP-JMS Binding specification

>From email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html

Description:
Section 2.6.1.1:
Description of JMSReplyTo has a "must" that should be replaced.

Not capitalized, bolded, or flagged as normative, and would be redundant with other normative statements anyway.

Proposal:
Change "Otherwise the implementation must determine the reply queue,..."

to "Otherwise the implementation has to determine the reply queue,..."