ISSUE-50 (Missing SOAP 1.1 indication): Apparently redundant statements are about different versions of SOAP [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

ISSUE-50 (Missing SOAP 1.1 indication): Apparently redundant statements are about different versions of SOAP [SOAP-JMS Binding specification]

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/50

Raised by: Eric Johnson
On product: SOAP-JMS Binding specification

>From email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html

Description:

Section 2.5:
First: "An instance of a binding to JMS conforming to this binding
specification MUST support the following message exchange patterns:†"

and shortly following: "In the case of SOAP 1.2 a conforming SOAP-JMS
Binding instance MUST  support the following message exchange patterns:†"

These seem redundant.  Upon closer inspection, and by looking at the test cases, the first case is referring to SOAP 1.1 support.

Proposal:
Eliminate the possible confusion by inserting the detail about the SOAP version.

Change:
"An instance of a binding to JMS conforming to this binding specification MUST support the following message exchange patterns"

to
"An instance of a binding to JMS conforming to this binding specification MUST support the following SOAP 1.1 message exchange patterns."

Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 18:25:17 UTC