- From: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:34:51 +0000
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
ISSUE-46 (replyToName spurious assertion): replyToName has "SHOULD" assertion about where the message should be sent. [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/46 Raised by: Eric Johnson On product: SOAP-JMS Binding specification >From email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html Section 2.2: soapjms:replyToName definition: "Specifies the name of the destination to which a response message SHOULD be sent". Problems: * Not flagged as normative * Redundant, as Protocol-2008 already indicates that it MUST be used to determine JMSReplyTo. Proposal: Change sentence in question to read: "Specifies the name of the destination to which a response message will be sent."
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 23:34:52 UTC