Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Review of draft-merrick-jms-uri-05


On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Eric Johnson <> wrote:
> We've not heard back from anyone on this previous question.  If the
> above proposed change is a helpful clarification, please let us know.
> Otherwise, we're going to leave the JMS scheme proposal as it is.

>From my POV, it doesn't make any difference.


Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 20:36:11 UTC