Re: [APPS-REVIEW] Review of draft-merrick-jms-uri-05 from Mark Baker on 2009-05-04 (public-soap-jms@w3.org from May 2009)

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:35:29 -0700
To: Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
Cc: "SOAP/JMS (list)" <public-soap-jms@w3.org>, apps-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <e9dffd640905041335o4a19e760x1f240719e60553e1@mail.gmail.com>

Eric,

On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> wrote:
> We've not heard back from anyone on this previous question.  If the
> above proposed change is a helpful clarification, please let us know.
> Otherwise, we're going to leave the JMS scheme proposal as it is.

>From my POV, it doesn't make any difference.

Mark.

Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 20:36:11 UTC