Dear SOAP Over JMS WG, I am glad to see that the group has made great progress with the spec since I left. Below please find the comments that I have, as an individual contributor, to the current version of the SOAP/JMS binding spec. -- Comments -- 1. General Comments The JMS URI Scheme spec defines there variants: "jndi", "queue", and "topic". It is not clear whether all three variants have to be supported by a conforming implementation of the binding spec. If "queue and "topic" variant have to be supported as well, it would make sense to discuss the meaning of the relevant properties (for example, destinationName and replyToName) in the cases where the jms-variant is "queue" or "topic". 2. Chapter 2.2 It seems to me that there may be a discrepancy between what is specified here and what is described in 3.4.5 (also 3.6.1.1) regarding the precedence between WSDL elements or attributes and WSDL endpoint URI. A couple of small examples or use cases would help to clearly demonstrate the precedence rules. Regards, Dongbo
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2009 14:07:23 UTC