- From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:11:26 +0000
- To: Dongbo Xiao <dongbo.xiao@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Michael Chen" <MICHAEL.X.CHEN@oracle.com>, public-soap-jms@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:12:19 UTC
Greetings Dongbo, in your feedback you included the following comment which he have assigned the identifier: LC08 [1]. 1. General Comments The JMS URI Scheme spec defines there variants: ?jndi?, ?queue?, and ? topic?. It is not clear whether all three variants have to be supported by a conforming implementation of the binding spec. If ?queue and ?topic? variant have to be supported as well, it would make sense to discuss the meaning of the relevant properties (for example, destinationName and replyToName) in the cases where the jms-variant is ?queue? or ?topic?. The description of the soapjms:lookupVariant in 2.2.1, Connection to a destination has been updated by adding "The jms-variant: jndi MUST be supported." The latest version of the editor draft includes the change [2]. Please confirm whether the change we have made satisfies the concern that you raised. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2009-01_LC_Comments#LC08 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#binding-connection Regards, Roland Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 12:12:19 UTC