Re: Agenda for the 2009-11-03 conference call

Ah, shoot - copied and pasted the wrong thing.  Let me try again - this
was supposed to be for the 12-15 agenda....

-Eric.

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Greetings, our next call will take place on Tuesday 2009-11-03 at
> 17:00UTC and last for at most 1 hour.
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009&month=11&day=03&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=136&p2=179&p3=283
>
> We will be using the Zakim bridge [1], the phone numbers and passcode
> for the call can be found at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin
>
> Participants are invited to join IRC channel #soap-jms as documented on
> the WG's administrative home page:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin#irc
>
> 1) Appointment of the scribe
>
> 2) Approval of prior meeting minutes
> http://www.w3.org/2009/10/27-soap-jms-minutes.html
>
> 3) Review the agenda
>
> 4) Review action items
> Actions: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/32 - Eric
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/68 - Derek
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/108 - Eric
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/109 - Mark
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/112 - Eric
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/117 - Phil
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/120 - Mark
>
> 5) URI specification:
> Resolve IP language and resubmit - any progress?
> * We need to get all contributors to current version to agree to the
> same IP language, preferably the 200902trust.  Now waiting on:
>  * Oracle
>
> Received OK from TIBCO, Software AG,  IBM, Progress
>
> Any updates?
>
> 6) Raised issues:
> List: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/raised
> (No Raised Issues)
>
> 7) Accepting proposals to close open issues
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/open
> Issue 15: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/15
> Issue 16: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/16
> Issue 17: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/17
> Issue 18: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/18
> Issue 19: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/19
> Issue 20: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/20
>
> 8) Accepting applied resolutions:
>
> Issue 4: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/4
> Applied resolution:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Oct/0016.html
>
> Issue 14: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/14
> Applied resolution:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Oct/0006.html
>
> 9) FAQ - Comments anyone?
>
> 10) Testing
> * Discussion: How do we define/describe the WSDL test cases?
>
> 11) Implementations - any updates?
>
> 12) AOB?
>
> Administrative items:
>  * Regrets:
>  * Links:
>   * Binding spec editors draft:
>     http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html
>   * CR:
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-soapjms-20090604/
>   * URI scheme
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri/
>   * FAQ:
>     http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/wiki/2008-09_FAQ
>
> -Eric Johnson
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 22:08:27 UTC