Re: Updated testcase documentation

Greetings Phil, looks good. I have made an update to the spec for 1003 and 
1004 to incorporate the optional nature of WSDL support into the assertin 
data that appears in appendix E. No change to the body, just what get 
summarised in the appendix.

Regards, Roland
FBCS, CITP
IBM Software Group, Strategy, Software Standards
Tel/Fax: +44 (0)1926-465440



From:
Phil Adams <phil_adams@us.ibm.com>
To:
public-soap-jms@w3.org
Date:
21/04/2009 22:12
Subject:
Updated testcase documentation




Hi everyone, 
I spent a few hours this afternoon updating the testcase documentation 
with the following changes: 
1) I added two new testcases (test1009 and test1109) that deal with the 
new "unsupportedLookupVariant" fault subcode 
2) I cleaned up some inconsistencies in some of the testcase entries 
(testcases.xml) 
3) I went through the list of assertions and for some which were not 
currently "covered" by any testcase, I found testcases which do indeed 
cover those assertions so I updated the testcase entries to reflect that.  
  The result is that the assertions table has fewer "uncovered" 
assertions.   Most of the ones that are still uncovered probably can 
remain that way.  For example, I don't think it would be useful to 
associate a testcase with Protocol-2024.   Some of those "assertions" from 
the soap-jms  binding spec aren't really test assertions at all as I 
discovered. 

Here's a link to the updated testcase docs: 
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases


Thanks, 
Phil 
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Phil Adams (phil_adams@us.ibm.com) 

WebSphere Application Server 
Office: (512) 286-5041 (t/l 363) 
Web Services Development 
Cell: (512) 750-6599 
IBM - Austin, TX 









Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU