Greetings Eric, no idea why the issue didn't get logged. . .
but on the issue itself, but would I be correct to assume that you are
referring to the elements in the soapjms namespace that are used with
WSDL, e.g.
<soapjms:deliveryMode>PERSISTENT</soapjms:deliveryMode>
if so, then I agree that this needs to be addressed.
Regards, Roland
From:
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
To:
"SOAP/JMS (list)" <public-soap-jms@w3.org>
Date:
07/10/2008 19:52
Subject:
Re: NEW ISSUE: No XML Schema describes the elements defined in the
specification
OK, so that's weird. According to the W3C site, sending an email with
the format I used for this one will file an issue in the bug database,
but nothing happened.
See: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/#issues
Anyone know why that didn't work?
-Eric.
Eric Johnson wrote:
> Description: Neither the current published working draft, nor the
> editors draft defines an XML Schema description of the elements defined
> in the specification.
>
> Proposal: Add Appendix B to specification, defining the XML Schema for
> the new elements in the specification.
>
> -Eric.
>
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU